I've noticed something. Whenever there's a push one way ideologically, there seems to be another "counter push" or backlash in the other direction. Many cultural and social changes have come about as a response to a disagreed-with ideology or value system. Hippies had long hair in rebellion to the buzzed look of men in the army, and their parent's conservative short hairstyles.
Like it or not, this happens theologically as well; sometimes our attitudes and the things that we focus on within scripture and our faith come from an attempt to distance ourselves from what we perceive to be a false doctrine or incorrect teaching. We begin to drift into the other extreme in regard to what we're opposed to - we run to the other end of the spectrum.
When talking about God, especially to non-believers, I tend to highlight His love and forgiveness. I am continually amazed by and enamored with His insanely awesome love towards us - and I've actually been criticized for this. To me, it's frustrating to be constantly reminded that God hates sin - of course He does, that's why when He sent Jesus to die for our sins, the magnitude of His love was shown; Jesus took our punishment- God set us free through Him. Of course, "through Him" means just that; He is the only way.
I'm writing this, because I now know why I've been criticized for emphasizing God's love: Rob Bell. I've recently become familiar with the term "Universalism", as some suspect Bell of following this line of thought. Apparently Bell believes that all people go to heaven - a view clearly not supported by scripture. The Christian community has understandably begun to distance themselves from Bell, and make known that his teaching on this subject is not theologically sound.
Bell's views bring up a ton of issues, but right now I'm just concerned with a few implications of what I see as a backlash against Bell. For one, his acknowledgment that God is a loving God, is true - and in an attempt to counter him, we shouldn't downplay that love. I also think that it's unnecessary to emphasize how horrific hell is and how many people are going there. The Gospel is good news - it doesn't downplay or eliminate the reality of hell, but the focus is on Christ, and not on eternal damnation. Focusing on hell can lead to being motivated by fear.
I also have been given a hard time about expressing hope for many of the lost; I believe that God doesn't wish for anyone to perish, and that as Christians we hold the responsibility of spreading The Good News to as many on this planet as possible. In an attempt to counter Bell, we might end up expressing a kind of "there are going to be a lot of people in hell anyway" attitude and dismiss those around us that we could be attempting to share the Gospel with.
I think that Bell's views are actually a backlash as well; he is most likely frustrated with a focus on damnation, and feels that many are unnecessarily turned off by not hearing enough of the good in the good news. He is teaching unbiblical - and really, illogical - doctrine however, and I am in no way supporting his views.
I think that we as Christians have a right to feel alarmed at Bell's teaching, but I also hope that in our effort to distance ourselves from his views, we don't run to the other extreme and teach that hardly anyone at all will get into heaven, so we might as well dismiss those we consider "sinners".